SALMON NEWS 

Pressreleases / Communiqués / Pressemitteilungen 
(all in original language, en langue originale, in Originalsprache):

    Contents:

  • 12.11.01: Saumons de l'Adour
  • 12.11.01: Judge refuses to reinstitute Oregon Coho protections
  • 07.11.01 : La situation du saumon en France
  • 15.10.01: Oregon river dam giving way to salmon
  • 16.09.01 : Le gave de Pau : les saumons prennent l'ascenseur
  • 14.09.01: European issuance of patent for genetically-modified farmed salmon blasted.
  • 12.09.01: Salmon life stories recorded in strontium
  • 24.08.01: Judge rejects corps' motion, case against Snake river dams goes on.
  • 24.08.01: WDFW says drought and dam operations have killed millions of mid-columbia fall-run chinook this year.
  • 24.08.01: Bush administration pressures Europe to drop restrictions on genetically modified food, NFI comes out with its guidebook.

12.11.01: Saumons de l'Adour

Les captures 2001 sont les suivantes : 167 à la ligne, 118 pour les professionnels en rivière et 700 à 800 dans l'estuaire !
Source Lettre sea river No 29

12.11.01: Judge refuses to reinstitute Oregon Coho protections

On 10 September, U. S. District Court Judge Michael Hogan in the case Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans (District of Oregon Case No. 99-6265-HO), revoked the National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) listing, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), of all central Oregon coho (silver) salmon. The federal government has until 9 November to appeal the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and ask for a stay of his order (which if granted would reinstate ESA protection), but as of this date had not yet decided its course of action. Unless NMFS does appeal, however, ESA protections for these coho will no longer apply, at least until NMFS can issue a new decision in accordance with Judge Hogan's order. As a result of Judge Hogan's dissolution of ESA protections, however, several federal timber sales, grazing allotment sales and other federal activities that biologists have stated would seriously harm coho salmon can now proceed without the need for a consultation or any changes required by the ESA. On 30 October, a motion by several groups (including PCFFA and IFR) to stay Judge Hogan's order pending an appeal and to intervene in that case for purposes of appeal were heard in Judge Hogan's courtroom. Hogan denied the request for a stay, but took the request to intervene for purposes of appeal under consideration, to rule on or before the 9 November appeals deadline. For further information contact Patti Goldman, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, (206)343-7340 or pgoldman@earthjustice.org.

07.11.01 : La situation du saumon en France

La pêche du saumon en France est particulièrement démocratique surtout par rapport à d'autres pays. Le bilan 2000 de sa pêche est à la fois encourageant et inquiétant. Voici les chiffres et les remarques en provenance du Conseil supérieur de la Pêche.
Le nombre de pêcheurs de saumon à augmenté en 2000 (+ 23%) avec 2761 personnes ayant acquitté le timbre "migrateur". Certes le nombre de pêcheurs de saumon a chuté depuis 1987 mais la pêche est fermée sur l'Allier. Il est aussi difficile de connaître le nombre exact de pêcheurs de saumons puisque depuis 2000, la taxe "saumon" et celle pour "truite de mer" sont regroupées en une seule taxe dite "migrateur".
2244 captures ont eu lieu en 2000 soit environ 4 prises pour 5 pêcheurs. Le nombre moyen de saumons par pêcheur repasse sous l'unité (il était supérieur à 1 entre 1994 et 1996). L'exploitation des carnets de pêche montre que 43 % des pêcheurs sont restés bredouilles! Les cours d'eau normands ont vu leurs prises croître essentiellement grâce à une prolongation de la pêche des castillons (petits saumons ayant passé une seule année en mer). Presque 1 000 saumons sont capturés dans les estuaires. Ces chiffres sont proches des valeurs des 10 dernières années.
La durée totale de pratique pour une capture est descendue à 94 heures (elle dépassait 150 heures les années précédentes). La pêche plus importante des castillons (en été) explique cette diminution. La capture des saumons de printemps demande deux fois plus d'efforts que celle des castillons. Des maxima de capture (TAC) ont été mis en place pour les saumons de printemps qui semblent les plus vulnérables et les plus intéressants au plan reproduction. Lorsque ces quantités sont atteintes, la pêche est fermée. Ce qui a été le cas sur 6 cours d'eau : Sée, Léguer, Sélune et Douron en particulier. Cette disposition a permis de protéger une bonne trentaine de géniteurs. A noter que dans les bassins où cette disposition a été prise, les stocks augmentent.
Le groupe de travail saumon atlantique du Conseil international pour l'exploitation de la mer a établi qu'en Europe du nord (Scandinavie, Russie, Islande), les effectifs demeurent équilibrés entre saumons de printemps et d'été, peut être en raison de la proximité des zones de grossissement (mer de Norvège, îles Féroé). En revanche, les stocks de l'Europe du sud (France, Espagne, Royaume-Uni) sont plus déséquilibrés, les saumons de printemps sont de plus en plus rares et les castillons de plus en plus nombreux. Au point que le nombre de poissons remontant en eau douce est inférieur au seuil de conservation. Autrement dit : la quantité d'oeufs déposée ne peut plus assurer un nombre suffisant de poissons pour les années suivantes.
Le groupe de travail saumon atlantique du Conseil international pour l'exploitation de la mer a établi qu'en Europe du nord (Scandinavie, Russie, Islande), les effectifs demeurent équilibrés entre saumons de printemps et d'été, peut être en raison de la proximité des zones de grossissement (mer de Norvège, îles Féroé). En revanche, les stocks de l'Europe du sud (France, Espagne, Royaume-Uni) sont plus déséquilibrés, les saumons de printemps sont de plus en plus rares et les castillons de plus en plus nombreux. Au point que le nombre de poissons remontant en eau douce est inférieur au seuil de conservation. Autrement dit : la quantité d'oeufs déposée ne peut plus assurer un nombre suffisant de poissons pour les années suivantes.
Le point le plus inquiétant est certainement la diminution de la survie en mer. Pour obtenir une remontée équivalente il faut de plus en plus de smolts descendant en mer. Une réduction des prélèvements marins s'impose donc. Des quotas de pêche ont été rachetés pour limiter la pêche marine. Existe-t-il d'autres raisons? Maladies? Raréfaction de la nourriture par fonte des glaciers? Beaucoup d'hypothèses sont possibles, d'autant que la survie en mer diminue également sur les castillons. La mise en place des TAC et les mesures prises en eau douce ont permis de conserver une population de saumons d'été stable.
Ces conclusions inquiétantes ne doivent pas nous faire oublier les réussites sur la Dordogne et la Garonne (où la pêche est fermée).

Source : la lettre de Sea-River Semaine du 5 au 11 novembre 2001 - N° 28

15.10.01: Oregon river dam giving way to salmon

USA, Oregon. - An 80-year-old dam that helps irrigate Oregon farmland will be knocked down and replaced with a new pumping station, boosting local fish runs, government officials and conservationists said last week.
The concrete Savage Rapids Dam blocks migrating salmon and steelhead on the Rogue River and can easily be replaced, officials said.
"The Rogue is one of Oregon's most spectacular natural treasures, a waterway that is legendary for its scenic beauty, fish and wildlife, and amazing whitewater," Gov. John Kitzhaber said at a news conference in Salem, the Oregon state capital.
The agreement, he added, will "restore and protect this incredible river, while still allowing farmers to meet their water needs."
Farmers dependent on water from the dam will be supplied by a new pumping system that will divert water into irrigation canals without disturbing the fish, including endangered salmon, in the river.
The dam, which stands 39 feet (13 metres) high and 460 feet (153 metres) wide, would be the biggest ever removed from an Oregon river. It has been a source of contention between farmers and conservationists for 10 years.
It was built in 1921 about five miles (8 kms) east of Grants Pass, Oregon, to divert water for farmers.
But it serves no storage, flood control, or hydropower purpose. The fisheries bureau said the dam was the "biggest killer" of salmon and steelhead on the river.
Dam removal would result in an increase of about 114,000 more salmon and steelhead each year, providing approximately $5 million annually in economic benefits, the Bureau of Reclamation said.
A vote taken last year found 63 percent of the users of the irrigation water supported removing the dam.
The removal could cost the federal government as much as $23 million.
Story by Bruce Olson
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

16.09.01 : Le gave de Pau : les saumons prennent l'ascenseur

Le gave de Pau, rivière du Sud ouest de la France, sera bientôt réouvert à la migration du saumon. Des études sont actuellement conduites au niveau de l'obstacle majeur, le barrage de Baigts, pour restaurer au mieux la libre circulation des poissons. Elles ont pour objet d'installer une nouvelle passe à poissons de type ascenseur. Ce dispositif devrait être constitué par une successions de bassins et terminé par une cage qui sera relevée régulièrement afin de libérer les captifs à l'amont de l'ouvrage. Cet aménagement fait suite au suivi par radiopistage du déplacement des saumons effectué sous la responsabilité scientifique et technique du Ghaappe (Groupe d'Hydraulique Appliquée aux Aménagements Piscicoles et à la Protection de l'Environnement), groupe de travail constitué par le Cemagref de Bordeaux, le CSP (Conseil Supérieur de la Pêche) et l'INPT (Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse). Il a mis en évidence les problèmes rencontrés par l'espèce lors de la remontée du cours d'eau. En effet, ces 126 kilomètres sont entrecoupés de 38 obstacles à franchir par les poissons migrateurs. Le barrage de Baigts retenait à lui seul près de 70% des candidats à la migration. Ce nouvel aménagement devrait permettre d'augmenter considérablement le nombre d'individus capables de franchir l'obstacle. Cela n'est pas encore suffisant pour assurer la pérennité de l'espèce, mais d'autres initiatives vont suivre. De même pour la quinzaine d'ouvrages du gave de Pau qui posent des problèmes de migration aux salmonidés. Contact Cemagref (service communication) : veronique.leclerc@cemagref.fr

Source : La Lettre de Sea-River n°20

14.09.01: European issuance of patent for genetically-modified farmed salmon blasted.

On 10 September, the environmental organization, Greenpeace, issued a scathing denunciation of the European Patent Office (EPO), based in Munich, for issuing the first ever patent on genetically modified (GMO) fish. The Canadian company Seabright, according to Greenpeace, obtained patent EP 578 653 on Atlantic Salmon and all other fish species carrying an additional gene for faster growth. In the patent application the company reports on experiments leading to fish eight times bigger than normal salmon. The patent was granted under the controversial EU Directive on "Biotechnological Inventions" (98/44/EC), which was implemented by the EPO (a non- EU body) in June 1999. Some EU member states, the Council of Europe, as well as expert groups on ethics, churches, physician associations, fishermen and farmer organizations have also voiced their opposition against patents on plants, animals and genes. Until Monday, only a few member states have implemented the EU Directive, which allows for such kinds of patents.
"Several leading marine biologists and fishery organisations have expressed strong concerns that, once released into the environment, genetically modified fish could become invasive species and cause irreversible damage to wild fish stocks and to the wider marine ecosystem", said Greenpeace's Christoph Then. "Yet the granting of this patent encourages the development and commercialisation of these 'monster' salmon and any future genetically modified fish carrying the growth hormone gene. The European governments and the EU should immediately introduce legislation banning the release of this genetically manipulated fish."
The patent was granted on 17 July. Seabright (now renamed "Genesis") has licensed the use of the growth hormone genetic modification technology to its related company, A/F Proteins. An application for the commercialization of genetically modified salmon for use in aquaculture (fish farm) operations has been recently filed also with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) (see Sublegals, 4:02/06; 3:19/03). A/F Proteins claims to have 15 million genetically modified fish eggs ready for sale to fish farms around the world after being granted the authorities' approval. For further information on Seabright and for their links to AF/Proteins, go to: http://www.mun.ca/seabright/af_protn.html.
More information is also available at: http://www.mun.ca/seabright/AF_protn.html 2.
Copies of the patent documents are available at: http://www.greenpeace.de/Intl-patents/patents.htm, also see: http://www.greenpeace.org/.
Source : Fishlink Sublegals

12.09.01: Salmon life stories recorded in strontium

In work that has implications for sport fisherman, scientists and natural resource agencies, University of Michigan researchers have developed a method that lets them reconstruct the environmental history of individual salmon and identify the juvenile habitat of an adult fish returning from the ocean to spawn. In research to be presented at the annual meeting of the Ecological Society of America on Aug. 7, U-M researchers Brian Kennedy, Andrea Klaue, and Joel Blum, along with Dartmouth College researcher Carol Folt, have found that the element strontium, relatively common in bedrock beneath streams, accumulates in the bony tissues of Atlantic salmon and leaves a specific chemical signature, depending on the geology of the watershed in which the fish is living. This discovery could reveal whether certain rivers or tributaries produce fish that are more likely to survive their time in the ocean and successfully make the return trip to spawn in the stream where they hatched.
Conventional methods of tracing fish movements involve tagging thousands of juvenile fish in hatcheries with fin clips, dyes, or PIT (passive integrated transponder) tags and then hoping that the tagged fish are among the fraction that get re-caught as returning adults years later. It is a labor-intensive procedure that does not yield as much information as scientists would like. Young fish do not necessarily stay in the streams into which they are released, so the tag on a recaptured adult fish may only indicate where the fish was released as a juvenile, not where it spent most of its life. By taking advantage of the natural variation in strontium isotopes (alternate forms of the element that are present in different watersheds), scientists now can differentiate fish from specific geologic areas without having to use a man-made marker previously attached to a fish. "It's a natural tag," says Kennedy, a research fellow in the Department of Geological Sciences. "In addition to linking adult fish to their juvenile stream, now we can look at juvenile movements between streams, so it gives us a really good indication of where they are spending their juvenile phase." At a given area in a watershed, strontium isotope ratios are very stable and show little seasonal or temporal variation. Kennedy and his colleagues identified 11 different geologic signatures for 18 regions of the Connecticut River and its tributaries in central and southern Vermont, an area that has been the focus of Atlantic salmon restoration efforts for more than 30 years. Then they looked at the strontium isotope ratios in backbone tissue of juvenile salmon and in otoliths---bits of bony material near the brain known as "ear stones"---of adult salmon. Additional tests with independently tagged fish provided a control to measure the natural variability of isotope ratios for neighbor fish.
The otoliths become a record of the fish's environment. "The neat thing about it," says Kennedy, "is the chemical information is laid down in the otoliths on a daily basis, and they can be 'read' much like tree rings, but on an even finer scale."
Atlantic salmon generally spend two years inland in streams and rivers as juveniles, and then head out to the ocean for a few years before returning to their home stream to spawn. Knowing which streams produce salmon that successfully make this round trip will enable specific habitats to be targeted for protection and could provide valuable information about where to release hatchery fish or how regional habitat restoration efforts are influencing adult survival.
"We're letting nature apply the tag and then reading it, without incurring the potentially high financial costs or mortality rates of artificial tags," says Kennedy. "It could be very useful for distinguishing fish populations in both wild and managed settings."

Source: European Water Management News

24.08.01: Judge rejects corps' motion, case against Snake river dams goes on.

On 22 August, U.S. Federal District Court Judge Helen Frye refused a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) motion to dismiss the Clean Water Act (CWA) case against the Snake River Dams (National Wildlife Federation et. al. v. US Army Corps of Engineers, US District Court of Oregon, Civ. No. 99- 442-FR). The Judge allowed the plaintiffs (which include PCFFA and IFR) leave to amend their complaint in light of the recently issued Record of Decision (ROD) adopted by the Corps in May 2001 on the various options available for the four lower Snake River dams. The Corps has continued to refuse to address CWA violations at the Snake Dams, maintaining in its ROD that the existence of the dams actually made the water cooler, not warmer, a conclusion not supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the State of Washington and the observed data. The Corps will have to file the complete administrative record 60 days after the new complaint is filed. The lower Snake River dams create long reservoirs of hot water that often reach temperatures that are fatal to salmon and have never met Washington's Clean Water Act standards since those standards were adopted. For more information contact: Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Attn: Kristin Boyles, Esq., 705 Second Ave, Suite 203, Seattle, WA 98104 or call: (206) 343-7340.
Source : Fishlink Sublegals

24.08.01: WDFW says drought and dam operations have killed millions of mid-columbia fall-run chinook this year.

The Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) estimates that as many as 3 million fall-run chinook died along a 51-mile stretch of the mid-Columbia River this year as the juvenile salmon tried to migrate their way downstream, reported the Seattle Post-Intelligencer on 22 August. WDFW found more than 1.6 million dead juvenile salmon alone in a 17-mile stretch of river below the Priest Rapids Dam, where the fish spawn each year between April and June. While water fluctuations caused by dam operations were less than in previous years, low water due to the drought exacerbated their impact; as the river ebbed and flowed, shrinking pools trapped the fish and suffocated or cooked them as Eastern Washington temperatures soared, and additionally they became easy prey for birds, in the biggest fish kill of the year in the Columbia Basin. The Hanford Reach salmon that were killed here are the healthiest run of wild fall chinook in the state. These salmon, which are not listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), are important to Washington's commercial, sport and tribal fisheries.This fish kill was the largest loss of fry tabulated in the fall chinook run since monitoring began three years ago. The number of dead baby fish along the surveyed stretch of river increased more than 2000 percent since last year, when 72,000 fry were killed. Nearly 126,000 fry perished in 1999. However, more fry were hatched this year than in recent seasons. Approximately 23.8 million fall-chinook were hatched in 2001, up from an estimated 17.9 million fry in 2000.The average number of fry since 1998 has been approximately 20.9 million in what is the last successful naturally spawning population in the Basin. Because of the huge loss of fry, fluctuations in flow will need to be more stringently regulated, according to WDFW, and it will monitor the number of juveniles hatched this year that return to the river in coming years. Likewise, the number of wild fall chinook caught by fishermen may need to be curtailed in the future, said a WDFW spokesman. To see the full story go to: http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com.
Source : Fishlink Sublegals

24.08.01: Bush administration pressures Europe to drop restrictions on genetically modified food, NFI comes out with its guidebook.

Greenlines reports that the Administration of U.S. President George W. Bush is pressing the European Union (EU) to drop new restrictions on genetically modified food. Administration officials claim the rules could cost U.S. companies $4 billion a year, and that they violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. PCFFA and a number of other U.S. fishermen's organizations, conservation and consumer groups have raised concerns regarding the spread of genetically-modified (GMO) foods, including plans to use genetically modified salmon in fish farm operations.
There has been a growing reaction in Europe to U.S. fast food chains, foods coming from large corporate food processors, foods treated with chemicals and, now, opposition to genetically modified foods. The movement is also growing in the U.S. with increased consumer demand among high-end buyers for, among other items, wild fish in season that are sustainably harvested (e.g., wild Pacific salmon, albacore, Dungeness crab, Pacific halibut). The 20 August issue of The Nation (pp.11-16) features an article by Alexander Stille "Slow Food An Italian Answer to Globalization" on the movement. It can be seen at: www.thenation.com or go directly to the organization's website at: www.slowfood.com. In the meantime, WorldCatch New Network reported 21 August that the National Fisheries Institute (NFI) is offering free fact sheets to help chefs, retailers and consumers in making seafood choices. "The fact sheets describe the various seafood species, and explain the regulations that govern their harvesting, growing or importation." There are now 28 fact sheets published by NFI, presently the only U.S. national fishery lobbying organization which represents, among others, major fish and food processing companies, restaurant chains (e.g., Red Lobster) and seafood importers (e.g., farmed shrimp, salmon). The fact sheets are in response to a number of seafood guides that have been published over the past year and to the Seafood Choices Alliance. For more information, go to: www.seafoodchoices.com. For more information on the NFI fact sheets, go to: www.worldcatch.com.
Source : Fishlink Sublegals

 

Back to the Homepage

These pages and their content are © Copyright of European Rivers Network.
For more information, remarks or propositions, send us a message !.